Rules
and Regulations for Program Initiation, Review, Change, and Termination
(cont'd)
(adopted by Board of Trustees of Drexel
University, 7 May 1991)
IX.
The Preliminary Review
A.
The SCAA will forward a proposal to the VPAA who will establish a specific
period for preliminary review and notify the SCAA, faculty and academic
administrators under whose purview the program exists as to the date of
the end of the period.
1.
Proposals can be submitted at any time.
2.
The period for preliminary review will be scheduled to be consistent
with the calendar of critical deadlines (Section VIII).
B.
The SCAA will conduct a preliminary review of a proposal and then report
on it to the Senate.
1.
In support of the Senate's responsibility to advise and comment, the
SCAA and its Academic Committees may, prior to submission of the proposal
to the Senate, conduct inquiry among those faculty members and academic
administrators associated with the program to:
a.
assure that all faculty members and academic administrators in the
program are aware of the proposal;
b.
ascertain the degree of acceptance of the proposed program changes
among faculty members and academic administrators.
2.
The SCAA may refer a proposal to the appropriate Academic Committee
which will conduct the preliminary review and report its findings in
writing to the SCAA recommending either revision of the proposal or
forwarding for formal review.
3.
The SCAA will review a proposal in light of the recommendations of the
Academic Committee, make further inquiries if it deems necessary, and
produce a written review report to the Senate, recommending revision
of the proposal or the SCAA will forward it for formal review.
4.
If the report recommends formal review, it will state whether or not
an external panel of reviewers should be appointed.
C.
The Senate shall submit its advice and recommendations to the VPAA.
1.
The Senate has the option to adopt the SCAA review report as its own.
However, if deemed necessary, the Senate could undertake other means
of review for the purpose of augmenting or supplanting the SCAA review.
2.
The Senate may recommend formal review (including the necessary level
of review), revision or rejection of the proposal at this point.
D.
The VPAA will make a preliminary assessment of the merit of the proposal
after receiving the Senate's preliminary review and after conducting any
other preliminary inquiry that may be deemed appropriate.
E.
If necessary the VPAA will return the proposal for revision based on
the preliminary review and simultaneously notify the SCAA of the action
by means of a copy of the preliminary review file.
1.
The proposal may be rejected** at this
stage with the concurrence of both the VPAA and the SCAA acting on behalf
of the Senate and in agreement with the Senate's Preliminary Review
Report.
2.
Approval of the proposal for formal review requires that either the
'VPAA or the SCAA approve it based on the following considerations:
a.
academic excellence and desirability;
b.
appropriateness to University's goals;
c.
fiscal soundness.
3.
The VPAA will include the reasons for the revision request in the review
file.
4.
Written statements of the reasons for approval for formal review or
disapproval of the proposal will be made by the VPAA and the SCAA.
**
In the case of Periodic Review of an Existing Program the proposal cannot
be rejected at this stage, but can be returned for revision.
|